There are generally three forms of papers, thought papers, research papers, and papers that are creative. There can be components of all three present, but papers largely get into among the three categories. The main focus on REL 303 is the thought paper; no outside research is required. The main focus on REL 407 in the shorter papers is the thought paper; no research that is outside required. The main focus on REL 407 within the final paper may be either a thought paper, which requires no outside research, or a research paper involving utilization of outside sources.
- a) Thought papers will make use of materials beyond the required reading but do not need to do this. Rather, the main focus is on careful study, analysis, and elaboration of ideas presented within a context that is limited such as just one article or book with some support from assigned secondary readings. It is often helpful to concentrate on 1 or 2 ideas, passages, or paragraphs and consider the ramifications thereof.
- b) Research papers cope with a study that is careful of evidence available to support and refute arguments. You aren’t needed to go to outside material, however it is often beneficial to obtain supporting evidence beyond what exactly is based in the required texts to back up your assertions.
- c) Creative papers can sometimes include forms such as fictional narrative, personal narrative, poetry, and illustrations as a key part or all the product that is finished. It is vital to work closely because of the instructor should you want to do an even more creative project.
- d) you may possibly write on one regarding the suggested topics, or perhaps you may formulate your very own topic; when you look at the latter case you ought to write out a paragraph-length topic and submit it by email towards the instructor for approval.
- e) Sometimes it may happen that an even more personal narrative style would be incorporated into your writing, one that includes personal experiences, fictional narrative, or reflections in regards to the writing process. Some of the suggested paper topics will elicit different styles or genres of writing. However, it could be more challenging to adopt styles that are alternative genres. If you wish to follow different avenues of writing but are unsure about how to do that, samples are for sale to your perusal.
Peer review drafts will soon be needed for some papers. Guidelines for peer review will separately be made available.
Although grading is an imprecise art, you’ll be able to attain a substantial degree of consistency. As a whole, one of the keys points are: Represent ideas fairly and accurately, raise critical questions and doubts, explore theses questions and doubts to provide a sophisticated account associated with the ideas and issues into consideration, and write clearly. I look for listed here when papers that are reading
- a) Writing. You will think clearly and in an organized fashion if you write clearly and grammatically. If you think clearly, this is reflected in your writing.
- b) Accuracy. Maybe you have represented the relevant ideas fairly?
- c) Focus and balance that is coverage-a of two. From the one hand, maybe you have covered the ideas that are main to your topic? On the other side, are you focused enough? A feeling of the bigger picture must be present, but pursuing themes that are too many ideas leads to confusion.
- d) Sophistication and depth. Have you taken into account various areas of a problem or idea? You can be accurate at a general level (« The Buddha was a seeker of truth. »), you can also be accurate at a level that is sophisticated »The Buddha was a seeker of truth who formulated his understanding with regards to the four noble truths. »). Have possible questions and objections been taken into consideration?
- e) Creativity. Will you be ready to accept unexpected insights and a sense of adventure?
Even though there are no hard and fast rules, you should get a B. Provided you have gone that far, you can add further dimensions to your paper if you cover criteria a) through c. I have made on your paper or your grade, please come and see me if you have any questions about comments. It is important for me to know of every doubts or problems.
In Closing
By studying these guidelines, i really hope that the learning experience shall be more pleasurable and rewarding for both me and you. These guidelines are supposed to assist you to polish a skill, academic writing, as you progress that you are developing. Aren’t getting so hung up you feel your creative processes hindered about them that. If anything, they need to provide just an adequate amount of a framework to convey your analytical and creative skills. The accompanying essay emphasizes the creative element of paper writing.
I prefer writing. When I am totally absorbed written down, many ideas which have never occurred in my experience before can pop up in my own mind, or once confused and fragmentary information and thought can be spontaneously organized and start to become clear. It is one of the more moments that are satisfactory me.
Yet, I often struggle for very long periods attempting to organize ideas at the cruel paper that is white. This is also true whenever I am attempting to be logical and systematic, starting with an overview. Since anything unclear or vague is eliminated in the act of making a plan, the paper actually is organized, clear, and compact, but I rarely have a feeling of satisfaction.
What’s the distinction between a paper which emerges spontaneously and something that begins with http://www.eliteessaywriters.com an issue for logical consistency? I have been wondering the way I can bridge the gap between those two forms of writing and the attitudes they represent. I’ve discovered some clues to those nagging problems in three articles compiled by Donald Murray, Peter Elbow, and William Stafford.
Whatever they emphasize in accordance is the process; writing is not the description of a result; in fact, writing itself can cause the result. What this means is that people must not worry too much on how the final draft will come out, or exactly how we can organize all of our ideas before we begin. Relating to Murray, what we need for writing is enough information and a clear purpose: logic or order can appear later in the process. Elbow even denies the necessity for coherence within the initial stages of producing writing. He suggests « freewriting, » which activates the writing process through getting rid of every concern about correction. Also, Stafford remarks that the most important things for his writing are receptivity and a willingness to quit high standards. For all among these writers, logic and organization, that has restricted me in some ways, are secondary during the initial stage of production. It is a fact that logical rigor is essential, but we could worry about that just as much as we like after everything happens to be in writing that we desire to say.
The most important thing written down is, while the three writers agree, the productivity of writing. In accordance with Murray, as an example, writing is the process of « making something that had not been there before, finding significance where others find confusion and bringing order to chaos. »By writing you can find new things, which may be a new thought, a new feeling, a new idea, as well as a brand new self which you could not have found without writing.
So that you can promote this type or sorts of productivity, Murray, Elbow, and Stafford agree on the necessity of opening our minds. Murray points out that writing gives us a way to capture, in the conscious level, unconscious feelings and ideas we had not noticed or had forgotten. Elbow says freewriting is a strategy to make our consciousness empty in order for we can pick out something unconscious from deep within our hearts. Stafford remarks that the energy letting him write is certainly not a device that is conscious his « own weak, wandering, diffident impulses » along with his « confident reliance » upon these impulses.
Writing could be compared to very simple blowing to the small window between consciousness and unconsciousness. The window is generally closed because consciousness is just too strong to let the window open, and something ends up living in only half of your home, this is certainly, the world that is entire of’s existence. But when writing occurs with all the mind open, a piece of cake opens the window and another can encounter other areas of the self, and even another self and fully become more integrated: The wonder of the writing process could even function as the act of some other self.